Thursday, March 14, 2019

The Role of Science, Ethics, and Faith in Modern Philosophy Essay

The Role of Science, Ethics, and Faith in Modern PhilosophyABSTRACT Curiously, in the late twentieth century, plain agnostic cosmologists like Stephen Hawkingwho is often comp ared with Einsteinpose metascientific questions concerning a Creator and the cosmos, which science per se is unable to answer. Modern science of the brain, e.g. Roger Penroses Shadows of the thought (1994), is only beginning to explore the relationship between the brain and the mind-the physiological and the epistemic. Galileo thought that Gods 2 books-Nature and the Word-cannot be in conflict, since both have a common author God. This entails, inter alia, that science and faith are to two roads to the Creator-God. David Granby recalls that once upon a time, science and religion were perceived as complementary enterprises, with each scientific advance confirming the grandeur of a Superior Intelligence-God. Are we then at the threshold of a fresh era of fruitful dialogue between science and religion, one tha t is intermediate by philosophy in the classical sense? In this root I explore this question in greater detail. The thesis of this probe is that philosophy is at an important crossroads at the end of the twentieth century in its role as paideiaphilosophy educating humanity. An unprecedented contend and opportunity for philosophy today is to mediate, and enhance understanding of the relationship, between science, morals and faith. A central question arises What can philosophy contribute to the emerging dialogue between science and theology? The emerging science-theology dialogue is characterized by complexity and considerable confusion regarding proper methodologies, goals, and possible interactions. There are at least three major schools, model... ...allacy. Reason (October) 53-58.Rust, Peter. 1992. How Has Life and Its variety show Been Produced? Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 44 (2) 80-94.Sternberg, Robert J. & Janet E. Davidson, eds. 1995. The Nature of Insig ht. Cambridge, MA MIT Press.Weber, Max. 1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Eds. Edward A. Shils & Henry A. Finch. Glencoe, IL Free Press.Weinberg, Steven. 1992. Dreams of a lowest Theory The Search for the Fundamental Laws of Nature. New York Pantheon Books.Wiester, John L. 1993. The Real mean of Evolution. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 45 (3) 182-86.Wigner, Eugene P. 1960. The Unreasonable potentiality of Mathematics. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 13 1-14.Yates, Steven. 1997. postmodernist Creation Myth? A Response. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies IX (1/2) 91-104.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.