Humanism and the Baroque Periods of Art

Humanism and the fancy Periods of ArtHumanism, specific entirelyy during the spiritual rebirth, was a broad movement towards the pitying mind as a whole and how laissez faire in expression of sights and ideas was celebrated. Tradition was not somewhatthing to be blindly followed any(prenominal) much. maven might argue that humanism played the biggest role in creating the Renaissance. This was because of the ample focus on studying Roman and Greek texts, which gave a impudent forbidden consider on their modern world focused on the human abi lightedy. Painting was influenced by humanism by becoming more hardheaded while also keeping forms classic. It also heavily focused on the human experience. The two paintings I found to show this well were The school of Athens by Raphael and The Tri providede M unmatchedy by Masaccio. In The take aim of Athens it is clear education is the main theme, which makes sense because humanism during that clo trusted had a lot to do with ed ucating and destineing for yourself. The Tri juste Money portrays a biblical scene in which Jesus performs a miracle to satisfy the assess payment. It has multiple things going on from the story at the same fourth dimension and the people be all doing different things. They are both groovy spokespersons of focusing the attention towards everyday behavior. You rat also see that, in every person take ined, they need a mind of their own. They look in different directions and are carrying out different actions, there is no one true center focus. Secularism and naturalism can be seen throughout Renaissance fraud as well. There is less focus on perform scenes and more focus towards the outdoors and creating an environment of the world. They aimed for accuracy in the paintings as well, which can be seen especially well in The Tribute Money. If you look towards the feet there are cast shadows and the brightness is used to create a much more realistic scene had there not been s hadows. What can also be seen is the movement of the people depicted, except for Jesus, which sets the scene as more of a photo in time instead of a perfectly posed scene that was recreated.The fancy period was started around the 1600s. It is thought to be that the close important pieces of history relating to the churrigueresco period were the renewal and the Counter Reformation. The Catholic Church declared at the Council of Trent that art was to depict religious ideas and themes. It focused on the most dramatic point in the story, compared to Renaissance art which focused more on a day-to-day portrayal of the scene. Baroque art is very dramatic and uses light to fill out the scene even more. The technique used, in reference to the lights and darks, is called chiaroscuro. It used vulgar lights and indistinctly lit scenes to make the painting even more dramatic. The colouration use was also very dramatic, although they might not be dexterous the feelingal appeal git col ors was used to help touch and evoke emotion in the viewer. The vulgar themes behind Baroque art were visions, ecstasies, death, and overall intense moments. One big difference in call between Baroque and Renaissance art is that the planes and depth in Baroque is much more limited than in Renaissance which had clearly specify planes and objects or people in the planes. Renaissances use of perspective gave them realism, which didnt allow the emotion that was trying to be depicted. It fell a bit flat, but Baroque came along and solved this issue by their use of style and luminosity to bring bum the emotion that was lost in the Renaissance period. dickens pieces of art from the Baroque period that showcase this are The Ecstasy of St. Teresa by Giovanni Bernini and The Conversion on the Way to Damascus by Caravaggio. The Ecstasy of St. Teresa held a very common theme in Baroque art, a meeting of the divine and human. The sculpture is of the moment St. Teresa recalled an angel co ming down and exquisite her with an arrow of love. The way light is used on the sculpture is Baroque in every sense, from the light coming down from a lily-livered tinted window above and wooden rods falling from behind being lit the same. The Conversion on the Way to Damascus is a smashing example of how Caravaggio used light and dark to create drama and emotion. It is a dimly lit scene with harsh light coming from out of view, lighting one side of the horse and Paul, while the man in the back is slipping away into the darkness.John Donne was known for his unusual style in writing. He had abstract verses, weird lengths, and often confusing metaphors. Although he went against the mite of writing at the time, he was given a better clench in later times. His unique style stemmed from religion and lust. He expressed both in a way those had not do before him, and it worked. I read that he was an Anglican minister, which gave his many contradictions live. His life was a bit of a co ntradiction seeing as he wrote about the physical nature of life and death while also weaving spirituality into his poems. Thomas Wyatt, on the other hand, took much of his ideas from Petrarch, although he did write poems of his own. They were more consistent in style. All of the sonnets we read by Wyatt were octaves followed by a sestet, and he had consistency in most of his writing. This is contradictory Donne who was sporadic and had little continuous style. One thing they had in common was their impact on the poetry of their times, both could be called innovators. The poems of Donne were also livelier in the sense that they had more emotion. They both had poems dealing with thoughts that might run through your head at certain times in your life, which I enjoyed. Wyatts poems were more pleasing to me, aesthetically, because I can enjoy poems more when they have a consistent theme and style. His writing is very similar, and I was satisfactory to pass more into it when I was abl e to understand the rhyme scheme. His theme behind his sonnets that we read was dealing with love and a loss of love. I was able to understand these even more as well because, as most everyone, has loved and loss that love at some point in their life. Not specifically a romantic relationship but any relationship allows you to feel those emotions and they are powerful, which made me enjoy them more.Aesthetics, to me, is almost indescribable. It is all around us, beautiful and appreciative. What makes it interesting is everyone views and appreciates the visual and literary arts in their own subjective way. It brings up questions that are hard to answer. What is beauty? These questions are what made aestheticism a movement to begin with. To find something aesthetic is to have a sense of beauty and emotion, the art itself provokes emotion within. To me, an artwork that sticks out as aesthetic are sculptures, specifically marble. David by Michelangelo is what stands out to me the most. W hen I saw the David in person, I was not stuck pondering the idea or sitting there thinking purely intellectually about the statue, but instead had this emotion fill me that almost made my jaw drop. The burn size alone had me breath taken and in awe. I think what makes something aesthetically important to me is the understanding of the time and craftsmanship it took to create it. The David is 17 feet tall and pure marble. Michelangelo took more than two years to create it as well. All that I learned after, which made it even more appealing, but even in that moment I knew there was something beautiful and great about the piece. It is hard to describe why I liked it so much at the time, but I think that is why some of the beauty in art is so amazing, an indescribable appreciation and nub for the piece. It can be a different piece or everyone, which Im sure will be seen by the responses to this question. Aesthetics of art is beautiful because of the subjectiveness it innately has wit hin. Whatever you are to find beautiful is justified, even if no one else does.